Posts
Even as new reports surface (almost on a daily basis) of Barack Obama’s ties to radicals, terrorists, and shady characters … the majority of the polling data available this morning indicates that Obama will win tomorrow’s presidential election.
Over the weekend, a former top deputy to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan reported that Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep, and that for many years the two men have had “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries.
Dr. Vibert White Jr., who spent most of his adult life as a member and ultimately top officer of the Nation of Islam, stated that Obama
was “part of the Chicago scene” where Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., and radicals alike, would go to each other’s events and support each other’s causes. White broke with the group in 1995 and is now a professor of African-American history at the University of Central Florida in Orlando.
Regardless to all of the legitimate concerns regarding this never ending list of associations, as well as, his inexperience, Obama is on the verge of becoming our nation’s 44th President.
In addition to the Presidency, the 2008 Congressional Elections are also projected to go largely to the Democrats. Think about it folks … we’re talking a Democratic Party that will control the Presidency, the House of Representatives, and the Senate … Not to mention … there is a possibility that the Democrats would obtain at least 60 seats in the Senate, which will in essence prevent any filibuster, a method used to keep a bill from coming to a Senate vote on a bill, from happening. Therefore, it would take a bipartisan effort to stop the passage of any bill that the Democrats wanted to become a law of the land, especially since President Obama would most likely not veto any law advocated by members of his own political party.
Should this nightmare become reality, then what possible consequences might have to be encountered by Americans the next four years as a result of the new Democratic policy of change?
With special thanks to Dr. Carl Parnell, these are the seven changes you can count on:
The first change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the spreading of the wealth of America’s working people. President Obama would make the "Robin Hood" ideology an integral part of his economic plan. He would take from the wealthy and give to the poor. In fact, if Karl Marx was alive he would be proud of President Obama. Of course, the United States has been spreading the wealth for years in some of its welfare-type programs, such as payments to destitute, handicapped, unemployed, sick, and aged Americans.
Needless to say, it is obvious that a Democratically-controlled government will increase taxes on the filthy rich and … most likely (don’t say you weren’t warned middle class) … on the not so filthy rich, too. Based on the bill that Senator Obama introduced in the Senate last spring, he would increase taxes to possibly fund his Global Poverty Tax. His goal for the introduction of this bill was to help people in other countries who are poverty-stricken. The bill requested over 800 billion dollars to be sent to third world countries to eliminate poverty. He would use the United Nations to spread this wealth all over the world.
The second change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the advancement of the gay rights’ agenda. This past spring 52 members of the House of Representatives formed a coalition of 50 Democrats and 2 Republicans who swore to promote the gay rights’ agenda in Congress. Since President Obama supports the gay rights’ agenda, could it be possible that more Congressmen might just jump aboard the bandwagon? Is it ridiculous to think that America’s elected representatives would spend any of their time to promote an alternative sexual orientation when America is fighting on two war fronts … let alone … whose economy and energy programs are in shambles.
The third change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the demoralization of American troops in Iraq. If American troops come home without complete victory, those who gave their life in defense of their country would have done it in vain. Also, America must keep its reputation as having the greatest military force in the world. If U.S. forces come home without defeating America’s enemies, the future of the security of the United States could very well be jeopardized. This is the reason that the United States must win the war in Iraq and also in Afghanistan. But, if President Obama gives up too early on these wars and undermines the integrity of the greatest fighting machine in the world, he would be establishing a precedent for defeat in the current wars and in any combat battles in the future. Of course, there will be future wars that the United States will have to fight probably in the very near future. Therefore, a weak commander-in-chief will demoralize America’s troops and Americans in general.
The fourth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the resurgence of the Democratic Party’s pro-abortion agenda in the United States. President Obama and his congressional colleagues would shore up any efforts to rid America of the blight caused by Roe v. Wade. The fact that taxpayers money would be used to pay for abortions for women who could not afford them is atrocious. How can a nation founded on the principles of the Bible continue to permit its leaders to promote such an abomination to God? Why should President Obama say "God Bless America" at the end of any speech that he would make? Of course, more importantly, what are the chances that President Obama would ever say "God Bless America" at the end of one of his speeches? But, it really does not matter if he does or not. God is not going to bless a nation that continually aborts (murders) unborn babies. In fact, according to Psalms 9:15, 17, and 19, the heathen are sunk down in the pit that they made … in the net which they hid is their own foot taken. The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God. Arise, O Lord: let not man prevail … let the heathen be judged in thy sight.
The fifth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the government’s involvement in providing healthcare for all Americans. Everyone in America should have health insurance. Life is too risky to walk around without any healthcare coverage. However, does the United States government have the proper credentials to run a nationalistic healthcare program? According to the dictates of a market economy, it is the responsibility of individuals to purchase health insurance from a private health insurance company. But, in a command economy, the type government associated with communism and socialism, the government provides healthcare for its entire people. Is this the direction that Americans want their national government to follow in order to ensure that all Americans have appropriate healthcare? Do Americans really want their government to control every aspect of their life? Should the United States government have the right to pressure private insurance companies to meet its demands? Should the United States government have the power to force Americans to pay a fine to the government if they cannot afford health insurance for their children? It appears that freedom of choice will have been eliminated as part of the way that Americans live their lives.
The sixth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the placement of a person in the highest office of the land who has very little leadership experience. He has been a state senator in Illinois and presently he is in his first term as a United States Senator representing the state of Illinois. Since he has never been governor of a state or mayor of a town, Senator Obama has no major budgeting experience. He also has never served in the military. Therefore, Senator Obama does not have the credentials to be the chief administrator and commander-in-chief of the greatest democracy in the world. Would a person who has never taught school be hired as the school principal? Would a recruit in the Army be promoted to general? Would a recent graduate of a police academy be hired as the local police chief? Would a first-year medical student be given an internship at a major hospital? Would a file clerk be promoted to CEO of a large corporation? Of course, the answer to all these questions would be a resounding "NO." Then, why are some people in the United States attempting to promote a freshman U.S. Senator to the Office of the Presidency? It makes absolutely no sense at all!
The seventh change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the possible association of the President of the United States with people who have questionable characters and or negative reputations. There are two main people (as well as several additional) that Senator Obama has had associations with that, according to some people, are less than desirable. First, Jeremiah Wright was Senator Obama’s former pastor for over twenty years. During this time, Rev. Wright preached many anti-American messages. The fact that Senator Obama stayed at Rev. Wright’s church is a good indication that he does not have a good judgment of character, especially since Rev. Wright was attacking the integrity of the United States. Second, William Ayers, who is currently a college education professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, admits to being involved with terrorist activities and bombing government buildings in the 1960s. Supposedly, Mr. Ayers stated that he wished that he had been even more active and had caused even more distruction. Mr. Ayers and his wife would have been sentenced to time in prison in the 1980s if it was not for the illegal surveillance procedures used by the government. Senator Obama and Mr. Ayers have worked on several committees together in the Chicago area. And now we can officially add Farrakhan to that list … among many others of questionable character.
America, please be careful what you wish for …
Needless to say, it is obvious that a Democratically-controlled government will increase taxes on the filthy rich and … most likely (don’t say you weren’t warned middle class) … on the not so filthy rich, too. Based on the bill that Senator Obama introduced in the Senate last spring, he would increase taxes to possibly fund his Global Poverty Tax. His goal for the introduction of this bill was to help people in other countries who are poverty-stricken. The bill requested over 800 billion dollars to be sent to third world countries to eliminate poverty. He would use the United Nations to spread this wealth all over the world.
The second change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the advancement of the gay rights’ agenda. This past spring 52 members of the House of Representatives formed a coalition of 50 Democrats and 2 Republicans who swore to promote the gay rights’ agenda in Congress. Since President Obama supports the gay rights’ agenda, could it be possible that more Congressmen might just jump aboard the bandwagon? Is it ridiculous to think that America’s elected representatives would spend any of their time to promote an alternative sexual orientation when America is fighting on two war fronts … let alone … whose economy and energy programs are in shambles.
The third change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the demoralization of American troops in Iraq. If American troops come home without complete victory, those who gave their life in defense of their country would have done it in vain. Also, America must keep its reputation as having the greatest military force in the world. If U.S. forces come home without defeating America’s enemies, the future of the security of the United States could very well be jeopardized. This is the reason that the United States must win the war in Iraq and also in Afghanistan. But, if President Obama gives up too early on these wars and undermines the integrity of the greatest fighting machine in the world, he would be establishing a precedent for defeat in the current wars and in any combat battles in the future. Of course, there will be future wars that the United States will have to fight probably in the very near future. Therefore, a weak commander-in-chief will demoralize America’s troops and Americans in general.
The fourth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the resurgence of the Democratic Party’s pro-abortion agenda in the United States. President Obama and his congressional colleagues would shore up any efforts to rid America of the blight caused by Roe v. Wade. The fact that taxpayers money would be used to pay for abortions for women who could not afford them is atrocious. How can a nation founded on the principles of the Bible continue to permit its leaders to promote such an abomination to God? Why should President Obama say "God Bless America" at the end of any speech that he would make? Of course, more importantly, what are the chances that President Obama would ever say "God Bless America" at the end of one of his speeches? But, it really does not matter if he does or not. God is not going to bless a nation that continually aborts (murders) unborn babies. In fact, according to Psalms 9:15, 17, and 19, the heathen are sunk down in the pit that they made … in the net which they hid is their own foot taken. The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God. Arise, O Lord: let not man prevail … let the heathen be judged in thy sight.
The fifth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the government’s involvement in providing healthcare for all Americans. Everyone in America should have health insurance. Life is too risky to walk around without any healthcare coverage. However, does the United States government have the proper credentials to run a nationalistic healthcare program? According to the dictates of a market economy, it is the responsibility of individuals to purchase health insurance from a private health insurance company. But, in a command economy, the type government associated with communism and socialism, the government provides healthcare for its entire people. Is this the direction that Americans want their national government to follow in order to ensure that all Americans have appropriate healthcare? Do Americans really want their government to control every aspect of their life? Should the United States government have the right to pressure private insurance companies to meet its demands? Should the United States government have the power to force Americans to pay a fine to the government if they cannot afford health insurance for their children? It appears that freedom of choice will have been eliminated as part of the way that Americans live their lives.
The sixth change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the placement of a person in the highest office of the land who has very little leadership experience. He has been a state senator in Illinois and presently he is in his first term as a United States Senator representing the state of Illinois. Since he has never been governor of a state or mayor of a town, Senator Obama has no major budgeting experience. He also has never served in the military. Therefore, Senator Obama does not have the credentials to be the chief administrator and commander-in-chief of the greatest democracy in the world. Would a person who has never taught school be hired as the school principal? Would a recruit in the Army be promoted to general? Would a recent graduate of a police academy be hired as the local police chief? Would a first-year medical student be given an internship at a major hospital? Would a file clerk be promoted to CEO of a large corporation? Of course, the answer to all these questions would be a resounding "NO." Then, why are some people in the United States attempting to promote a freshman U.S. Senator to the Office of the Presidency? It makes absolutely no sense at all!
The seventh change that would take place during an Obama administration would be the possible association of the President of the United States with people who have questionable characters and or negative reputations. There are two main people (as well as several additional) that Senator Obama has had associations with that, according to some people, are less than desirable. First, Jeremiah Wright was Senator Obama’s former pastor for over twenty years. During this time, Rev. Wright preached many anti-American messages. The fact that Senator Obama stayed at Rev. Wright’s church is a good indication that he does not have a good judgment of character, especially since Rev. Wright was attacking the integrity of the United States. Second, William Ayers, who is currently a college education professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, admits to being involved with terrorist activities and bombing government buildings in the 1960s. Supposedly, Mr. Ayers stated that he wished that he had been even more active and had caused even more distruction. Mr. Ayers and his wife would have been sentenced to time in prison in the 1980s if it was not for the illegal surveillance procedures used by the government. Senator Obama and Mr. Ayers have worked on several committees together in the Chicago area. And now we can officially add Farrakhan to that list … among many others of questionable character.
America, please be careful what you wish for …
No comments:
Post a Comment